Free tool · runs in your browser
Amazon dim weight = L×W×H ÷ 139, with a 2-in floor on width and height for bulky tiers. See which side governs your billable weight. Free, runs in your browser.
Measure the unit as it will be packed — the box, not the product.
Divisor: 139 cubic inches per pound — Amazon's US retail divisor, verified 2026-09-28. Freight forwarders use different ratios (167–200 kg per CBM for air and express, 1000 for sea); that is a separate calculation — see the CBM and chargeable-weight calculator.
Dim weight feeds the FBA fulfillment fee through billable weight, and it feeds freight quotes through volumetric weight — two different ratios applied to the same box. A unit whose dim weight exceeds its actual weight pays the dim weight to Amazon, and its carton pays volumetric weight to the forwarder. The workbench runs both, side by side, against your real carton plan.
Everything computes locally in your browser. No upload, no account.
A notional weight worked out from the volume a package occupies rather than from what it weighs. Carriers use it so that a large, light box pays roughly what the space it displaces is worth. Every carrier bills on the greater of actual and dimensional weight, never on both and never on a blend.
Multiply the three sides together and divide by a divisor. Amazon's US retail divisor is 139 cubic inches per pound, so an 18 x 12 x 10 in box is 2,160 divided by 139, about 15.5 lb. Freight forwarders work in metric and use their own ratios instead, which is a different calculation entirely.
On the bulky tiers Amazon assumes the two shorter sides are at least 2 in, so a genuinely flat item is billed for a thickness it does not have: a 30 x 0.5 x 9 in banner is charged as 30 x 2 x 9. Standard tiers have no such floor. The rule switches on when a sorted side passes the large-standard limits, not when the tier name sounds bulky.
No, it is the greater of the two. Every pound above the dimensional weight is free, and every cubic inch above the actual-weight equivalent is free. That asymmetry is what makes cutting packaging down to the next dimensional-weight bracket worth more than an equivalent cut in the product's own weight.
When the item is dense enough that actual weight exceeds dimensional weight, which covers most metal, glass and liquid products in small packs. The calculator tells you which one governs: if actual weight wins, no amount of repacking will move the fee and only real weight reduction will.
No. Amazon divides cubic inches by 139 to reach pounds. Forwarders multiply cubic metres by a channel ratio: about 200 kg per cubic metre for international express, 167 for air consolidation and 1000 for sea. The same carton can therefore look cheap on one channel and expensive on another.
Only by reducing volume, because the divisor is fixed. The longest side is usually the fastest win, since an inch off it removes more cubic inches than an inch off either short side. Where the 2-in floor applies, the two short sides are already assumed to be that tall, so making them genuinely thinner saves nothing and only the longest side is worth attacking.